So, here's what I propose: The complete genocide of the Human race. Kill them all off, and then those left over kill themselves. We're doing enough damage to the planet to cause it ruin, and apparently our benefits of existance mean nothing. We can't, generally speaking, think of very much anyone beyond ourselves, and no one can really agree on anything. The human race as a whole becomes more and more moronic, and our morals are flushing themselves down the toilet. I propose that it is time to screw us all, and have whatever caused us to come here in the first place to try again.

Although i have a crappy life (compared to milionairs i mean i have my basic needs met and slightly more than that) but have to disagree with you. I think that we are slowly going to a point where there will be equal conditions for everyone in the world and we won't have to kill each other to survive. My main hope lies in finding a better way to use fusion to create energy. And basically searching out for new sources of energy. When we find that, and we can use i don't know salt water to power our cars or power plants, then we could focus our efforts on cleaning the planet of all the pollution we created. I am not saying that this will be done immediately but you can here news all the time that scientist are getting more and more closer to discovering this things and i thing that i heard that Nissan is going to start mass production of cars on electricity in 2010 or something like that. When oil goes out of the picture i think that we will be fine cause then we have to find a new source of energy, and then it will be two scenarios one that we combine all our efforts to find it or we start killing each other (what was basically your plan from the beginning) for the last drip of oil. This could also happen with drinking water. All in all you will win either way cause if it goes with number one you will be pleasantly surprised, and if it goes with number two you will be happy cause that was what you have wanted from the beginning.

I sense a bit of sarcasm in Death Dark. Does this stem from the gun discussion?

I don't think that killing all humans on earth is the solution! Well I've heard stuff like this for years, people saying that we humans are destroying the earth and we should do this or that to protect it.
In reality, we don't have to kill ourselves to protect the earth. A little care and we'll be alright.

Screw your solutions, even if whe fixed the energy crisis, we'd still be a people falling into moral ruin. We cannot go on like this forever, or else we'll just end everything on accident anyhow. I say we begin now, while we can still control it.



Yes, and no. Yes, the gun topic inspired me in a way, but no, this is rather a bit different. I haven't decided if I'm serious about this yet or not.



Again, the earth itself is really the least of my concerns. I am merely under the impression that we have been here long enough. My point is merely that the humans need to die.

---------------

Let's see here...there are a few ways we can do this. The first way involves a group of well organized individuals who will systematically kill of people in an orderly fashion. We'd start with those of low importance, and work our way up to killing the president and the actors in Hollywood and whatnot. These people would then kill themselves.

However, this is a bad way of doing things because we can't fully trust the people to kill themselves. They may secretly save the human race or something.

So, my second plan is to have every a series of circles of people. Give each one a gun, and have them kill the person to their left on the count of three. You wouldn't dare not pull the trigger because the person on your right will.

But, there will still be screw-ups.

Therefore, my last plan is to completely take the Earth out with us. With enough thermonuclear devices in our grasp, we can wipe the surface of the earth clean, and/or go directly for the core. This would essentially reset the world to the alleged time when Evolutionsists say that life first "began," which means the world would restart itself somehow.

i think human life is gonna be like is has always been... some soon time we'll go rock bottom then have another golden age

Well since i don't have any more bright ideas (for now) on why not to kill everyone (but i will soon), i am gonna try to beat you with finding faults in your killing plans. The problem wouldn't be the disobedient group of killers. What you didn't count on is the resistance of the people you would try to kill. You think that they would just told you
Ok sure why not
and allow you to kill them. So they would overpower your group of killers, they wouldn't stand in the chain and kill of everyone in the right, and they wouldn't allow you to get your hand on weapons of any kind.
So what then?

That's why the group of assassains or the extermination crew (with the bombs) would have to operate under extreme stealth. They must not let on that they are the killers/exterminators, and just do their job. The assassains may be better at this, though I am now thinking that a combination of the two would be best (bomb the big cities, and assasainate the big leaders).

Rofl!

For such a Bible goer thats fully against Abortion, how are you pro mass genocide? Please explain.

Also I dont think the human race has been here long enough.

Long enough? We've been around at least 6000 years so far, I think we're through enough.

Humans are done, in my opinion. But, you see, there's a hidden catch to all of this: if God exists, there is no way that any of this can happen. God already has a schedule set up for the end of the world/humanity, and if He exists, He'll stop me in one way or another. So, even for this plan to be plausable, I have to ignore the existance of God while making the plans about how to kill everyone off.

We could always go the mass-disease rout. If we do a highly contageous disease with a "dead-time" on it (to keep it from killing the person or showing any symptoms), then we could pretty much wipe out the world without before it knows we're attacking. Again, we can always couple this with prior plans, just to keep things running right.

Evolution needs survival of the fittest. Birds have their beaks and wings, Lions have their brute strength, I'd say humans have their intelligence. Naturally, humans should evolve into more intelligent species. However, our morality causes us to save EVERYONE. There is no natural selection because the stupid people benefit from the smart people who find solutions and live on. Humans bring about a stop to evolution. All technological advances you see are not because we have evolved, but because we learned from our past. Simply put, we just had more time to develop on past ideas. I dont think people are getting smarter. We the drug abuse and obesity, I'd say we're getting dumber. If there is a genocide, I say we kill off the useless people because... well... they're useless... Like criminals for instance.

That is an entirely rediculous idea. If we kill off our manual labor force, then we'd have smart people doing things like sweeping floors, and dumping garbage. Besides, you didn't tell me why we shouldn't kill off the smart people as well.

I thought the first part of MZNova's post was quite an interesting point. And I already solved the part about sweeping streets... you force everyone into a rotation, give them their choices and they rotate through it maybe one month a year, for the other 11 months they do their normal job.

It seems plausable until you realize that this topic would involve the entire killing off of the human race, not just the smart or dumb ones.

I still have not been decently argued against.

what's it take to be a good argument?
you don't have the right to declare that nobodies life is worth living. that's a good enough argument for me